Small mammal communities of the Mongolian Gobi Region: diversity and impacts of mining

Shar S., Moroldoev I.V., Lkhagvasuren D.

P. 94-98

In the Gobi region of Mongolia, mining activities have developed rapidly over the last 20 years. The development of the mining sector is important for the economic growth of Mongolia, but local communities have always been critical of its negative impact. The purpose of our study was to determine the mining effects on the small mammal community in the Gobi region. In order to achieve this goal, we estimated the species diversity and abundance of small mammal populations in the vicinity of the Tavan Tolgoi and Oyu Tolgoi mines in Umnugobi aimag of Mongolia in August 2017 and in August 2018. Generally, mining activities in the Gobi region have negative impacts on small mammal communities, and at the same time effects differ on the different species of small mammals. DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.19.1.10

• Ardente N.C., Ferreguetti A.C., Gettinger D., Leal P., Mendes-Oliveira A.C., Martins-Hatano F. & Bergallo H.G. 2016. Diversity and impacts of mining on the non-volant small mammal communities of two vegetation types in the Brazilian Amazon // PLoS ONE. Vol.11. No.11. e0167266.
• Bannikov A.G. 1954. [Mammals of the Mongolian Peoples Republic]. Moscow: AN SSSR. 669 p. [in Russian].
• Bergallo H.G. 1994. Ecology of a small mammal community in an Atlantic Forest area in southeastern Brazil // Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. Vol.29. No.4. P.197–217.
• Caughley G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology // Journal of Animal Ecology. Vol.63. No.2. P.215–244.
• Chiarello A.G. 2008. Density and population size of mammals in remnants of Brazilian Atlantic Forest // Conservation Biology. Vol.14. No.6. P.1649–1657.
• Dulamtseren S. 1970. [Guidebook to the mammals of the Mongolian Peoples Republic]. Ulaanbaatar: Publishing House of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences. 105 p. [in Mongolian].
• Emmons L. 1984. Geographic variation in densities and diversities of non-flying mammals in Amazonia // Biotropica. Vol.16. No.3. P.210–222.
• Farrington J. 2005. The impact of mining activities on Mongolias protected areas: a status report with policy recommendations // Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. Vol.1. No.3. P.283–289.
• Fonseca G. & Robinson J. 1990. Forest size and structure: competitive and predatory effects on small mammal communities // Biological Conservation. Vol.53. No.4. P.265–294.
• Lambert T.D., Malcolm J.R. & Zimmerman B.L. 2006. Amazonian small mammal abundances in relation to habitat structure and resource abundance // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.87. No.4. P.766–776.
• Malcolm J.R. 1997. Biomass and diversity of small mammals in Amazonian forest fragments // Whitmore T.C., Laurance W.F. & Bierregaard R.O. (eds.). Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P.207–221.
• Ochoa G. 2000. The effects of logging on the diversity of small mammals in the lowland forests of the Venezuelan Guayana Region // Biotropica. Vol.32. No.1. P.146–164.
• Rogovin K. & Shenbrot G. 1995. Geographical ecology of Mongolian desert rodent communities // Journal of Biogeography. Vol.22. No.1. P.111–128.
• Sokolov V.E. & Orlov V.N. 1980. [Guide to the mammals of the Mongolian Peoples Republic]. Moscow: Nauka. 351 p. [in Russian].
• Tews J., Brose U., Grimm V., Tielbörger K., Wichmann M.C., Schwager M. & Jeltsch F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures // Journal of Biogeography. Vol.31. No.1. P.79–92.