Copulatory behavior supports a new insight into taxonomic status of root vole Alexandromys oeconomus (Rodentia, Arvicolinae)

Zorenko T.A., Atanasov N.I.

P. 48-57

The aim of the study was to evaluate the phylogeny and relationships of the root vole Alexandromys oeconomus with the other species of the tribe Microtini, using the comparison of the characteristics of sexual behavior. Thirteen copulatory behavior patterns that form a specific stereotype of the species’ mating behavior are used. The results showed the multiple thrusting stereotype of copulation, which includes separate intromissions and a very first mount with intromission, is ending with ejaculation (from 10% to 48%, depending by the investigated population). The number of ejaculations is comparatively big, varying from 4 to 7 (an average of 4.6) and the genital stimulation rate is from 68 to 260 thrusts. The males of the root vole noted active courtship for the female, which is accompanied by singing, waltzing and marking of the substrate. Marking the territory is manifested by rubbing the femoral region on the substrate, in which the secretion of the hip glands is applied to it. Analysis of the distances (or similarities) between species according to patterns of sexual behavior using the method of cluster analysis indicates the proximity of A. oeconomus to species of the genus Alexandromys and a considerable distance from representatives of the genus Microtus (Microtus s.str. and Sumeriomys). Significant interpopulation differences in copulatory behavior of the Central Asian phylogroup are established (54% of all the behavioral traits studied). The transformation of the stereotype of mating in individuals from Beringia phylogroup in comparison with the Central Asian one is particularly significant and reaches 77% of all the behavioral traits. The data obtained by the analysis of the copulatory behavior of the Alexandromys oeconomus support the separation of the species from genus Microtus.DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.17.1.05

• Abramson N.I. & Tikhonova E.P. 2005. Reevaluation of taxonomic structure of the root vole (Microtus oeconomus Pallas, 1776, Rodentia, Arvicolidae) from the territory of the former USSR based on evidence from craniometric and molecular data // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.4. No.1. P.63–73.
• Abramson N.I., Lebedev V.S., Bannikova A.A. & Tesakov A.S. 2009. [Stages of radiation in the phylogeny of voles (Arvicolinae, Rodentia): Data by nuclear genes] // Reports of the Academy of Sciences. Vol.428. No.5. P.713–717 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Abramson N.I. & Lissovsky A. A. 2012. Subfamily Arvicolinae // Pavlinov I.Ya. & Lissovsky A.A. (eds.). The Mammals of Russia: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (Archive of the Zoological Museum of MSU). Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. Vol.52. P.220–276.
• Aksenova T.G. 1973. [A structure of accessory sex glands in some species of grey voles of genus Microtus (Rodentia, Cricetidae)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.52. No.12. P.1843–1848 [in Russian].
• Andersen B.G. & Borns H.W. Jr. 1997. The Ice Age World: An Introduction to quaternary history and research with emphasis on North America and Northern Europe during the last 2.5 million years. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press. 208 p.
• Bannikova A.A., Lebedev V.S., Lissovsky A.A., Matrosov V.A., Abramson N.I., Obolenskaya E.V. & Tesakovs A.S. 2010. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the Asian lineage of vole genus Microtus (Rodentia: Arvicolinae) inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence // Biological Journal of Linnean Society. Vol.99. P.595–613.
• Baumgardner D.J., Hartung Th.G., Sawrey D.Kim, Webster D.G. & Dewsbury D.A. 1982. Muroid copulatory plugs and female reproductive tracts: comparative investigation // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.63. No.1. P.110–117.
• Brunhoff C., Galbreath K.E., Fedorov V., Cook J.A. & Jaarola M. 2003. Holarctic phylogeography of the root vole (Microtus oeconomus): implications for late Quaternary biogeography of high latitudes // Molecular Ecology. Vol.12. P.957–968.
• Borkowska A., Borowski Z. & Krysiukc K. 2009. Multiple paternity in free-living root voles (Microtus oeconomus) // Behavioural Processes. Vol.82. P.211–213.
• Chaline J. 1987. Arvicola data (Arvicolidae, Rodentia) and evolutionary concepts // Evolutionary Biology. Vol.21. P.237–310.
• Conroy C.J. & Cook J.A. 2000. Molecular systematics of a Holarctic rodent (Microtus: Muridae) // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.8. No.2. P.344–359.
• Galbreath K.E. & Cook J.A. 2004. Genetic consequences of Pleistocene glaciations for the tundra vole (Microtus oeconomus) in Beringia // Molecular Ecology. Vol.13. P.135–148.
• Getz, L.L., McGuire B., Hofmann J., Pizzuto T. & Frase B. 1990. Social organization and mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster // Tamarin R.H. (ed.). Social Systems and Population Cycles in Voles. Berlin: Birkhauser Verlag. P.69–80.
• Gray G.D. & Dewsbury D.A. 1973. A quantitative description of copulatory behavior in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) // Animal behavior. Vol.23. No.2. P.261–267.
• Gonzбlez-Flores O., Hoffman K.L., Delgadillo J.A., Keler M. & Paredes R.G. 2017. Female sexual behavior in rodents, lagomorphs and goats // Hormones, Brain and Behavior. Third edition. G.Gonzбlez-Mariscal (ed.). Mammalian hormone-behavior systems. Vol.1. P.59–79.
• Gromov I.M. & Erbayeva M.A. 1995. [The Mammals of Russia and adjacent territories. Lagomorpha and Rodents]. Sankt-Peterburg: Zoologicheskii Institut. 520 p. [In Russian]
• De Queiroz A. & Wimberger P.H. 1993. The usefulness of behaviour for phylogeny estimation: levels of homoplasy in behavioural and morphological characters // Evolution. Vol.47. No.1. P.46–60.
• Dewsbury D.A. 1972. Patterns of copulatory behavior in male mammals // Quarterly Review of Biology. Vol.47. No.1. P.1–33.
• Dewsbury D.A. 1981a. An exercise in the prediction of monogamy in the field from laboratory data on 43 species of muroid rodents // Biologist. Vol.63. No. 4. P.138–162.
• Dewsbury D.A. 1981b. On the function of the multiple-intromission, multiple-ejaculation copulatory patterns of rodents // Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. Vol.18. No.4. P.221–223.
• Dewsbury D.A. & Hartung T.G. 1982. Copulatory behavior of three species of Microtus // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.63. No.2. P.306–309.
• Estep D.Q., Lanier D.L. & Dewsbury D.A. 1975. Copulatory behavior and nest building behavior of wild house mice (Mus musculus) //Animal Learning and Behaviour. Vol.3. P.329–336.
• Feldhamer G., Thompson B. & Chapman J. 2003. Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation. Second edition. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1216 p.
• Haring E., Sheremetyeva I.N. & Kryukov A.P. 2011. Phylogeny of Palearctic vole species (genus Microtus, Rodentia) based on mitochondrial sequences // Mammalian Biology. Vol.76. P.258–267.
• Iwasa M.A., Kostenko V.A., Frisman L.V. & Kartavtseva I.V. 2009. Phylogeography of the root vole Microtus oeconomus in Russian Far East: A special reference to comparison between Holarctic and Palearctic voles // Mammal Study. Vol.34. P.123–130.
• Kenney A.M., Hartung Th.G. & Dewsbury D.A. 1979. Copulatory behavior on the initiation of pregnancy in California vole // Brain, Behavior and Evolution. Vol.16. No.2. P.176–191.
• Lukhanov V.A. 2013. [Phylogenetic reconstructions: characters, models of evolution and methods of phylogenetic inference] // Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta RAN. Supplement No.2. P.39–52 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Lissovsky A.A., Obolenskaya E.V. & Petrova T.V. 2013. Morphological and genetic variation narrow-headed voles Lasiopodomys gregalis from South-East Transbaikalia // Russian Journal of Theriology. Vol.2. P.83–90.
• Lissovsky A.A., Petrova T.V., Yatsentyuk S.P., Golenishchev F.N., Putincev N.I., Kartavtseva I.V., Sheremetyeva I.N. & Abramson N.I. 2017. Multilocus phylogeny and taxonomy of East Asian voles Alexandromys (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) // Zoologica Scripta. Vol.47. No.1. P.9–20.
• MacPherson A.H. 1965. The origin of diversity in mammals of the Canadian arctic tundra // Systematic Zoology. Vol.14. P.153–173.
• McGill T.E. 1962. Sexual behavior in three inbred strains of mice // Behaviour. Vol.19. P.341–350.
• Meyer M.N., Golenishchev F.N., Radjably S.I. & Sablina O.V. 1996. Voles (subgenus Microtus Schrank). Proceedings of the Zoological Institute. Saint-Petersburg: Russian Academy of Science. 320 p. [In Russian, with English summary]
• Nadler C.F., Rausch V.R., Lyaponova E.A., Hoffmann R.S. & Vorontsov N.N. 1976. Chromosomal banding patterns of the Holarctic rodents, Cletrionomys rutilus and Microtus oeconomus // Zeitschrift fьr Sдugetierkunde. Vol.41. P.137–146.
• Paradiso J.L. & Manville R.H. 1961. Taxonomic notes on the Tundra vole (Microtus oeconomus) in Alaska // Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. Vol.74. P.77–92.
• Rausch R.L. 1963. A review of the distribution of Holarctic recent mammals // Gressett J.L. (ed.). Honolulu: Pacific Basin Biogeography Bishop Museum Press. P.29–44.
• Rutovskaya M.V. 2015. [Variability and formation of sound communication of the voles of the subfamily Arvicolinae]. Abstract of the Thesis of Dr.Sc. degree in Biology. Moscow. 48 p. [In Russian]
• Quay W.B. 1968. The specialized posterolateral sebaceous glandular regions in Microtine rodents // Journal of Mammalogy. Vol.49. No.3. P.427–445.
• Tast J. 1966. The root vole, Microtus oeconomus (Pallas), as an inhabitant of seasonally flooded land // Annales Zoologici Fennici. Vol.3. P.127–171.
• Zakrzewski R. J. 1985. The fossil record // Tamarin R. H. (ed.). Biology of New World Microtus. Utah: American Society of Mammalogists. P.1–51.
• Solomon N.G., Keane B., Knoch L.R. & Hogan, P.J. 2004. Multiple paternity in socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) // Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol.82. P.667–1671.
• Viitala, J. 1994. Monogamy in free living Microtus oeconomus // Annales Zoologici Fennici. Vol.31. P.343–345.
• Zorenko T.A. 1990. [The ethological analysis in the taxonomy of rodents on the example of the voles of tribe Microtini of the USSR fauna] // Author’s abstract of the thesis of Dr. Sc. degree in Biology. Leningrad: ZIN AN SSSR. 41 p. [In Russian]
• Zorenko T.A. 2000. [Morphology of the genitals and sexual behavior of the social voles of the subgenus Sumeriomys (Arvicolinae, Microtus)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.79. No.8. P.990–999 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Zorenko T.A. 2007. [Establishment of relationship of voles from Siberia and the Far East based on the analysis of their sexual behavior] // Theriofauna of Russia and adjacent territories. Proceedings of the International Meeting. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. P.581 [in Russian].
• Zorenko T.A. 2013. [Social voles of the subgenus Sumeriomys: systematics, biology and behavior]. Saarbrücken: Palmariun Academic Publishing. 541 p. [In Russian]
• Zorenko T.A. & Aksenova T.G. 1989. [Structure of genitals, sexual behavior and problem of isolating mechanisms in voles’ tribe Microtini] // Aktual’nie problemi zoologii. Riga: Izdatel’stvo Latviiskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. P.111–132 [iIn Russian, with English summary].
• Zorenko T. A. & Malygin V.M. 1984. [Effects of ethological reproductive isolation mechanisms for the hybridization of three species of common voles group arvalis (Microtus, Cricetidae)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.63. No.7. P.1072–1983 [in Russian, English summary].
• Zorenko T. & Atanasov N. 2017. Patterns of Behaviour as an Evidence for the Taxonomical Status of Lasiopodomys (Stenocranius) gregalis (Pallas, 1779) (Rodentia: Arvicolinae) // Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, Supplement No.8. P.189–197.
• Zorenko T.A. & Rutovskaya M.V. 2006. [Social behaviour of the reed vole, Microtus fortis (Rodentia, Arvicolinae)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.85. No.8. P.983–997 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Zorenko T.A. & Skinderskaya I.A. 1996. [Estrous cycles and behavioral receptivity in social voles of the subgenus Sumeriomys (Rodentia, Arvicolinae)] // Zoologicheskii Zhurnal. Vol.75. No.10. P.1735–1747 [in Russian, with English summary].
• Zorenko T.A., Smorkachova A.V. & Aksenova T.G. 1994. Reproduction and postnatal ontogenesis of the Mandarin vole Lasiopodomys mandarinus Milne-Edwards, and a comparison with Brandt“s vole Lasiopodomys brandti Radde (Rodentia, Cricetidae) // Laboratory Animals. Vol.4. No.1. P.5–16.